Author: Mark Young
Date: 11:27:18 08/31/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 31, 1998 at 05:42:18, blass uri wrote: > >On August 31, 1998 at 05:32:58, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>...but Anand's 2790, when comparing match results. >> >>Jouni > >Do not forget that Rebel10 had better hardware than Junior5. >Rebel10 had better hardware than pentium400 in the match against anand >when Junior had only pentium333. > >Uri I don’t think the results of Junior 5 can be laid at the feet of slower hardware. Unless you can show that it would have not made the mistakes it did given a bit more time. Is this the case with Junior 5 and if so how much time did it need to chose the better moves to avoid the mistakes? Junior 5 still showed great skill overall in the match with yudasin. And showed me it is one of the top programs around. Since you have Junior 5 can you show us the line it was thinking when it play Qb8? in one of the game 30 games with Yudasin? And how long does it take for Junior to see that Qb8? was a mistake?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.