Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Why is Junior 7.0 stronger? (Omid)

Author: stuart taylor

Date: 19:17:41 10/08/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 08, 2002 at 19:12:22, Roy Eassa wrote:

>On October 08, 2002 at 17:37:26, martin fierz wrote:
>
>>On October 08, 2002 at 16:48:39, Omid David wrote:
>>
>>>On October 08, 2002 at 16:35:48, Ricardo R Santana wrote:
>>>
>>>>It will be nice to see if Kasparov could socre as fine as Kramnik. It's seems
>>>>Kramnik playing style is more than adequate to play against computers...but
>>>>Kasparov risky style seems dangerous against a tactical mosnter...so, wee will
>>>>see...
>>>>
>>>>Ricardo Sant Ana
>>>
>>>
>>>Kasparov will win, but won't score as good as Kramnik because:
>>
>>i think you are right, but...
>>
>>>1. Kasparov's style ("fire on board"!) isn't suitable for anti-computer match
>>mainly for this reason.
>>
>>>2. Junior is much stronger than Fritz
>>
>>huh? that's just your gut feeling. where is the proof? not in the qualifier
>>tournament for this match, and not in the SSDF list for sure.
>>
>
>I think country of origin may preclude objectivity here.  I think Junior 7 is
>quite strong but Deep Fritz 7 is stronger by a good 30-50 Elo on similar
>hardware.
>
I also live here, but if Junior is stronger, why is it much lower down in the
ssdf list? You were not talking about Junior 8, as that hasn't played yet.
S.Taylor



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.