Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Victory for Computer Chess (!) = Waterloo

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 19:19:51 10/08/02

Go up one level in this thread

On October 08, 2002 at 21:20:37, martin fierz wrote:

>thorsten, i'm shocked! did you just write that you are going to make a decision
>based on SSDF results?? aren't these the guys who produce lots of irrelevant
>stats? :-)

right. the more i consider about yur statement, i think you are right.
i will not wait until the ssdf-tested CM9000.

sorry for posting this.
it seems i was inconsequent :-)))


next CM i will buy is 10000.
i don't like those odd numbers.

• Re: Victory for Computer Chess (!) = Waterloo José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba 04:08:41 10/09/02
  • Re: Victory for Computer Chess (!) = Waterloo Thorsten Czub 08:11:46 10/09/02
    • Re: Victory for Computer Chess (!) = Waterloo Uri Blass 08:34:35 10/09/02
      • Re: Victory for Computer Chess (!) = Waterloo Thorsten Czub 13:30:04 10/09/02
      • Re: Victory for Computer Chess (!) = Waterloo Daniel Clausen 08:38:11 10/09/02
        • Re: Victory for Computer Chess (!) = Waterloo Thorsten Czub 13:32:40 10/09/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.