Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 21:24:51 10/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2002 at 17:48:54, Roy Eassa wrote: >On October 08, 2002 at 15:57:49, Albert Silver wrote: > >>On October 08, 2002 at 14:47:25, Eddie wrote: >> >>>On October 08, 2002 at 13:31:29, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>> >>>>Vladimir Kramnik is doing the right thing: he tries to get an endgame and then >>>>Deep Fritz has no chance. Just great to see Kramnik's excellent technic. >>>> >>>>Kurt >>> >>>It's kinda sad to see that Fritz has NO endgame! Kramnik exchanges queens, and >>>the game is over! Where are the mighty tactics of the computer? I want to see >>>some big bad middle games, w/queens on the board .... these endgame wins >>>against the prog are boring .... oh well .... have a great day! >> >>Kramnik has no such qualms. The match is worth a million dollars, his rep is on >>the line, so he is out to win. Period. In fact he adopted similar tactics with a >>certain human player in another match IIRC. If he scores against the computer >>playing according to his game plan, then it seems he is completely justified, >>no? >> >> Albert > > >It warms the heart to think that Kramnik will not just settle for draws if he >has winning chances. I guess not everything is ONLY about money! The only possible down-side is that with every victory, his confidence goes up. It won't take much to lead him down the road of over-extending or "trying too hard". There, they be dragons...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.