Author: Terry Ripple
Date: 04:29:11 10/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2002 at 12:36:52, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>On October 08, 2002 at 12:28:53, Yatheen Manicka wrote:
>
>>I played 14 matches CT15 v Ruffian 1.01, own books, at long time controls
>>(40/120'+40/120'). Each match could last upto 9 hours, played on a 1.3 GHz with
>>96MB hash for each side. The results were so lop-sided that they were
>>surprising. CT15 simply crushed Ruffian 11.0-3.0 (+8,=6,-0).
>>
>> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
>>CT 15 1 .5 1 1 1 1 .5 .5 .5 1 1 1 .5 .5
>>Ruffian 0 .5 0 0 0 0 .5 .5 .5 0 0 0 .5 .5
>
>
>exactly. Ruffian has no chance on 40/120 against ChessTiger15 and against
>hiarcs8.
>
>is your result one 1 or 2 machines ?
>
>it is is on 2 machines, it is even more a desaster.
>
>I knew this, because i have tried it out.
>but since so many people here only wanted to believe their
>fast-games (<1 minute per move)
>
>and their hype about ruffian, it was unpopular to believe my words.
>
>i can live with that.
>
>as i said: the ssdf would have known 1/2 year later :-)))
>
>thank you for your work.
---------------
Not enough games to prove anything other than Tiger won this match. Play the
next 14 games and the scores could very well be reversed!
PS. Don't get me wrong, because i do feel that Tiger is the stronger player!
Regards,
Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.