Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 04:39:07 10/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2002 at 02:30:04, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On October 08, 2002 at 14:42:33, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>Vincent, they are the _same_. > >In theory, perhaps yes. In practise, you'd have hard time getting one >to work as the other. But we all know bob can make perfectly fine evaluations to select which moves to try, don't we? :))))) >>>Apart from that, SE simply doesn't catch all those moves at all. instead >>>it sees things already when it's too late. the only reason i use SE is >>>to solve tactical tricks from the testsets quicker and because i already >>>search not much deeper than 10 to 11 plies. Above that SE is too expensive. >> >>If you don't believe it helps in games, why do it? >> >>wait, don't answer that... > >He already did in the paragraph you quoted. yes for testsets, i don't want to look too weak at testsets. But after having it turned on for 1.5 years now and experimented with several singular extensions i can assure you that it gives positional shit. >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.