Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 08:12:12 10/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2002 at 15:45:26, Christophe Theron wrote: >And your -as usual- patronizing remark is supposed to fix that moronity? Depends on how deeply rooted it is. In general I'm not that optimistic. >Still nothing interesting to say about computer chess? Depends on what you mean by interesting. At least I'm not occupied with badmouthing other chess engines like your latest comment raid against Ruffian. As I've written in another thread, it's almost trivially true that CT15 is stronger than Ruffian. So it's not really, or shouldn't be, an issue for most. However, the difference in strength doesn't preclude frequent wins by Ruffian in matches of limited length. The other part is the bias, one way or the other, excerting its influence on the matchresults, either consciously or subconsciously. This is trivial stuff IMO, so I assume you're aware of it as well. Biased participation in a moronic discussion ignoring the facts above doesn't bear witness of extensive brain activity. Regards, Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.