Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 09:41:19 10/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2002 at 12:23:27, Günther Simon wrote: >On October 09, 2002 at 07:58:06, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>Geschenkt. But I have a still worse discovery here. You wrote: >> >>"IMHO even a 1900+ player might have some chances for at least a whole >>point in this match being familiar with DF style and the biggest part >>of its opening book." >> >>Dream on, Günther! You are badly wrong here. Totally wrong. Even if you were >>able to hold the complete data in your memory you would not be able to master >>the technique problems later. You are talking like the pupil who's learning his >>first language and who thinks that now he could understand the conservation in >>that particular land. Or the student who heard or read something and then >>thought that he had understood it and now could explain it to other students. If >>you ever tried it you would have seen that such processes are not similar. >>Passive knowledge is different to practical abilities. I hope I could give you >>some important information. >> >>Rolf Tueschen > >May be we should get more specific: >dont you think that Kramniks team wasnt able to find 12...Bf8, when they >invented the novelty 9.Kf1!? dont you think they looked 7 plies more >into DF thoughts when flags _didnt play any role_ because DF could not >know this novelty which appeared after an usual wellknown opening? >Of course we can believe what Kramnik stated until now but how often >did players of important matches showed their secrets _after_ the match? >Why do you call this still a conspiracy? I call it professional biz... So you are calling Kramnik a liar? He directly answered that he had NOT seen or expected 12...Bf8. (Also, remember that he did not have the opening book in advance of the match.)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.