Author: martin fierz
Date: 12:12:24 10/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2002 at 15:07:16, John Merlino wrote: >On October 09, 2002 at 11:01:45, Roy Eassa wrote: > >>On October 09, 2002 at 05:02:15, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >> >>> >>>http://chessmaster.ubi.com/NR/exeres/DDFE83D9-77B9-40D8-852F-EA1D1B982B28.htm >>> >>>The analysis seems very interresting, but could we get the analysis in pgn >>>format? >>>It's way easyer to look at it while browsing the game >>> >>>Thanks >> >> >>There's a big error in the analysis. In game 3, 58...f2+ was indeed losing as >>stated, but Black had at least a draw with 58...Rf4! The article says Black was >>lost anyway. > >I would not necessarily call this an error. It appears to be Yasser's opinion >that Black is lost after the rook sacrifice. He is probably in the minority with >this opinion, but this opinion does have the advantage that the result of the >game itself bears it out. ...which only makes it worse! that is no advantage at all, that's just commenting according to result, which is a common error. there is another error in that Qh1+ instead of ..f3 will draw, and it's not even mentioned in the analysis. yasser just didnt look at some critical lines and you say that that is an advantage?? aloha martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.