Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 13:28:28 10/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2002 at 14:38:06, stuart taylor wrote: >On October 09, 2002 at 12:55:12, Otello Gnaramori wrote: > >>On October 09, 2002 at 12:50:22, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On October 09, 2002 at 12:46:42, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >>> >>>>...the question is if Fritz team is allowed to make the same changing of the >>>>params of the program to tune it better against the Human Champion strategy, or >>>>at least to make Fritz to not repeat the same moves each time... >>>> >>>>w.b.r. >>>>Otello >>> >>> >>>I think the pre-match agreement prevents this, which is a pretty stupid >>>stipulation IMHO. >>>The human can study a game and change his strategy for the next, but the >>>computer cannot? >>> >>>The agreement is really a joke, IMHO. >> >>Thanks for your prompt answer...I definitely tends to agree with you. >> >>Regards, >>Otello > >OK then, so there really is no comparrisson with the DB match at all. It was >that which broke Kasparov too, and Kramnik has none of these problems, as well >as the fact that I would gues he rates about 30-40 elo above Kasparov against >computers. >S.T. Not much is known about the DB2 match, except that no changes were made between rounds 1 and 2 while Kasparov was convinced there were. But the rules allowed it, even if it wasn't done according to the DB team...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.