Author: martin fierz
Date: 16:36:58 10/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2002 at 18:29:18, Ed Schröder wrote: >On October 09, 2002 at 17:40:34, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>its not that we expected fritz to win, but we expected fritz >>to stand, and maybe to get a few chances. >> >>to die in pride. but not to die without any chance. > >I remember the first 3 games against GM v/d Wiel where John completely outplayed >Rebel resulting in a 1-2 score where it should have been 0-3. Then after the >weekend the situation turned completely in favor of Rebel and the next 3 games >ended in 2.5-0.5 (where it should have been 3-0) in favor of Rebel. > >Bottom line: to early yet for an end conclusion. > >Ed hey ed, since you have "been there, done that": was this comeback of rebel due to "chance" (i.e. just a statistical fluke that vdW played well first half, rebel 2nd half), or did you actively intervene and change something about rebel to turn the match round? and if yes, would you mind sharing with us what you did? and do you have any ideas what the DF team would have to change if they were allowed to? aloha martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.