Author: Timothy J. Frohlick
Date: 18:35:07 10/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
Bob, Silicon computers are about 1/100,000th as complex as the human brain. That is just in terms of architecture. In terms of function I doubt that machines will ever match the human brain. Limited applications such as counting and ordering are much better in machines but conceptualization doesn't even exist in the silicon computer. Maybe in fifty years from now. Imitation of human capacity is not duplication. TJF PS This gives us something to look forward to. On October 09, 2002 at 18:05:21, Bob Durrett wrote: >There is nothing like seeing the top chess program getting CRUSHED by a mere >human to motivate the programmers. [Hopefully!] > >Kramnik is, arguably, the "top" human GM. The Deep Blue experience had raised >the hopes of chess programmers everywhere, because it appeared that the >programmers had already "arrived," or almost so. It seemed just a matter of a >few more years before the TOP human GM would be no match at all for the >brainchild [i.e. "chess engine"]of the community of chess programmers. But . . >. Alas! Kramnik has burst all those bubbles! : ) > >Sadly, the deficiencies being exploited by Kramnik have been well known to the >community of chess programmers for a long time. Endgame weakness, for example. > >Now, maybe, the horrible embarrassment of the crushing defeat of "chess engine" >by a mere human will motivate a flurry of activity to correct the known >problems. [Hopefully. Of course, there will be some who will merely offer >excuses.] > >There is nothing like worldwide public humiliation to provide "motivation." > >No more time for excuses. Time to roll up sleeves and fix the problem! > >:) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) > > >Robert Henry Durrett [Bob] > >P.S. I anticipate a rash of protests.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.