Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 10:22:27 10/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 10, 2002 at 13:09:45, Uri Blass wrote: > >I still did not try R=4 but it seems that R=3 is better than R=2 based on my >experience mainly at long time control. > >Uri I tried a mix of R=2, 3 and 4. In the tactical lines this works great, it fails high much sooner than with just R=2 and 3, but in games it didn't pay off. May be with proper tuning it can get under control. -S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.