Author: Amir Ban
Date: 11:58:19 10/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2002 at 17:48:43, Jason Jarrells wrote: > > > After what I have seen, I have NO doubt in my mind what so ever, that DEEP >BLUE is superior to Deep Fritz. I am so tired of people saying that Fritz is >superior to Deep Blue... That is total BS.. What do they base it one? I mean >do they compare Hardware? LOL.. Deep Blue looked at 200,000,000 moves a >second. Fritz sees 3,000,000 a second. Deep Blue gives Kasparov all he can >handle and them some. It WINS!!! Deep Fritz on the other hand is getting >OWNED!! TOTALLY ABUSED!! Kramnik isn't that much better then Kasparov. Some >people say that Kasparov just can't play against computers. I don't buy that. >We will se in a couple months. IF he abuses Deep Junior as Kramnik is to Fritz, >then will that answer the questions about the strength of Deep Blue? That will >be the strongest in my mind untill something can win over the best GM's. Or >untill they put Deep Fritz on Deep Blue's hardware. Then and ONLY then will >Fritz be stronger then Deep Blue. Deep Fritz evaluation is clearly better than Deep Blue's. I believe this is also true for the tactics, but anyway even if I concede the opinion of others that Deep Blue had awesome tactical powers, I note that this awesome power was not demonstrated in its match with Kasparov, as none of its wins or saves were due to tactics that are out of the reach of other programs (with the possible exception of its 36th move of the 2nd game, which doesn't appear to be due to tactics). As was discussed several times on this board, Deep Blue's legendary tactical ability was never demonstrated by any move it made over the board in its career. Amir
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.