Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 12:22:54 10/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2002 at 19:52:35, John Merlino wrote: >I, personally, certainly could not refute anything that any GM says! I'm just a >patzer. However, Seirawan does mention Qh1+ in the annotation for 58...f2+. So, >I expect that he felt that Qh1+ in that position is superior to the >not-mentioned Rf4, but who am I to say? By move 58, it was too late for Black to save the game with anything but ...Rf4. But several of us did detailed analyses using Fritz, Tiger, Ruffian, etc., and came up with completely forcing lines whereby Black at least drew with 58...Rf4 and, IIRC, also with 57...Qh1+ (note that the latter is on move 57, when it still worked, rather than on move 58, when IIRC it was too late).
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.