Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 15:15:48 10/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 10, 2002 at 18:06:12, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On October 10, 2002 at 15:00:33, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On October 10, 2002 at 11:25:53, Graham Laight wrote: >> >>>Considering that Fritz lost two of the first four games, and drew the other two, >>>winning three of the remaining four games (the minimum needed to win the match) >>>is a tall order. >>> >>>-g >> >>At this point even one more draw and a win is better than what most of us here >>expected from Deep Fritz. I still have hope for DF to win the first game of the >>match, and as Kramnik becomes more fatigue the better the chances for Deep Fritz >>to win one single game. This is a great accomplishment for Deep Fritz team to be >>able to draw at least 3 games, considering that Kramnik had the actual program >>before the match. This performance is much better than Deeper Blue of 1997, >>considering the condictions set before the match for Kasparov. >> >>Pichard. > > >No way DF could surpass the result posted by DB in 1997. It might _equal_ that >result if >it manages to win. But not if it gets drubbed as it has in the first four >games... Kasparov would have also drubbed Deeper blue if he was allowed to play against deeper Blue for at least a month before the match started. Lets NOT just count the # of Win or Draw here, lets consider the case under the same circunstance. Pichard.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.