Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 15:26:28 10/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 10, 2002 at 18:15:48, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On October 10, 2002 at 18:06:12, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On October 10, 2002 at 15:00:33, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On October 10, 2002 at 11:25:53, Graham Laight wrote: >>> >>>>Considering that Fritz lost two of the first four games, and drew the other two, >>>>winning three of the remaining four games (the minimum needed to win the match) >>>>is a tall order. >>>> >>>>-g >>> >>>At this point even one more draw and a win is better than what most of us here >>>expected from Deep Fritz. I still have hope for DF to win the first game of the >>>match, and as Kramnik becomes more fatigue the better the chances for Deep Fritz >>>to win one single game. This is a great accomplishment for Deep Fritz team to be >>>able to draw at least 3 games, considering that Kramnik had the actual program >>>before the match. This performance is much better than Deeper Blue of 1997, >>>considering the condictions set before the match for Kasparov. >>> >>>Pichard. >> >> >>No way DF could surpass the result posted by DB in 1997. It might _equal_ that >>result if >>it manages to win. But not if it gets drubbed as it has in the first four >>games... > >Kasparov would have also drubbed Deeper blue if he was allowed to play against >deeper Blue for at least a month before the match started. Lets NOT just count >the # of Win or Draw here, lets consider the case under the same circunstance. > >Pichard. Based on what? The match rules would _still_ have allowed modifications to be made between rounds. But Kasparov couldn't possibly have played against Deep Blue until it was completed, which happened a week or so prior to the match.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.