Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Unethical gamble with the psyche of Human chess players Part I

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 17:04:52 10/10/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 10, 2002 at 19:49:28, martin fierz wrote:

>On October 10, 2002 at 18:27:10, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>
>>On October 10, 2002 at 18:10:31, martin fierz wrote:
>>
>>>i don't know what you are talking about. "blitzing" your opponent is standard
>>>practice in human chess. i did it. it has been done to me. sometimes it works,
>>>sometimes not. there is nothing unfair in it.
>>>
>>>aloha
>>>  martin
>>
>>Ok, because it's you: please do not read me as if I would criticise Ed. What I
>>was trying to say was that such nonsense could not succeed. Because bliting in a
>>non-blitzing situation can't disturb a human GM! If someone plays with less
>>thinking, then it's his problem and a GM would never get nervous. Please re-read
>>what Ed wrote about his technique...
>
>i did. being "blitzed" is disturbing, whether you are a weak or a strong player
>- even a GM is disturbed by it, as the results of ed show.
>you write it's nonsense - i disagree: it is clear that the faster a game gets,
>the less chance a human has against the computer. disciplined chess players will
>think about the game they are playing while their opponent is to move. if you
>decide to have rebel play e.g. 40 moves in 1 hour, what effectively happens is
>that the GM gets 3 hours for 40 moves instead of 4, while the computer gets 1
>hour instead of 2, so you reduce your thinking time by 50% and the GM's by 25%.
>if you do this right (i.e. when using pondering, always move instantly if you
>have a ponder hit), you probably get a better percentage than 25%. and so you
>have succeeded in a) getting to a shorter time control at a relatively low
>price, and b) in psyching your human opponent. even without b) this might well
>be worthwhile!
>
>aloha
>  martin

Thanks again, but this seems really important for such show events. I didn't
know that.

Rolf Tueschen


>
>
>>And you are thinking that operators could do _everything_? Serious?
>>
>>Rolf Tueschen



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.