Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 17:05:05 10/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 10, 2002 at 18:44:13, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On October 10, 2002 at 14:21:54, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>The problem is that public perception is not always particularly acute. IE the >>general >>public feels that "chess was solved" by the DB project. It wasn't. The general >>public >>is going to conclude that "Fritz is a lemon" after getting soundly thrashed. >>Not a true >>conclusion, of course, but it will probably be "the conclusion" by the masses, >>which is >>unfortunate... > >(Could you please shorten your lines?) I am working on it. :) I just upgraded to redhat 8.0 and have not got the mozilla fonts set right yet. > >What do you expect if in CC you cultivate only the language of supelatives. I >mean you are one of very few who must raise their voice from time to time, but >the majority is dreaming. Most people can't understand what it means if you have >serious weaknesses in certain areas. Of course a GM can exploit it. That is >simply logical. > >Rolf Tueschen To me it is certainly logical. To some, the computers are simply super-GM players. I won't name names, they can step up if they want. But computers have a _long_ way to go before they become 2700+ as many are claiming. A 2700+ player simply won't get squeezed to death with no chance to win, as is happening in the match so far...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.