Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 03:38:28 10/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 11, 2002 at 05:52:21, Günther Simon wrote: >>>May be we should get more specific: >>>dont you think that Kramniks team wasnt able to find 12...Bf8, when they >>>invented the novelty 9.Kf1!? dont you think they looked 7 plies more >>>into DF thoughts when flags _didnt play any role_ because DF could not >>>know this novelty which appeared after an usual wellknown opening? >>>Of course we can believe what Kramnik stated until now but how often >>>did players of important matches showed their secrets _after_ the match? >>>Why do you call this still a conspiracy? I call it professional biz... >> >>I could see that Roy did already answer you. That is one point. The other is >>that I do not understand you, what you mean with your idea that he might have >>had it on the board. Let's try to analyse what you are saying and perhaps >>meaning. >> >>1. This is a match and nobody would tell the press and the opposite side what's >>really going on. Is that correct? I would agree with you. >> >>2. Your idea is that because Kramnik had Bf8 on the board he could prepare the >>whole game in advance. Is that correct? But then he should have forgotten Bc4? >> >>I have a completely different view. But my view is also not the whole truth! >>Perhaps it's completely wrong. But tell me what you are thinking if you read >>this... >> > >http://www.abendblatt.de/daten/2002/10/08/78213.html > >I dont know about the reputation of the 'Hamburger Abendblatt' but they >exactly mention that Kramnik should have told my view of things... >(I dont think they are going to take the risk to be sued by Kramnik?) >If you want you can translate the article into English as I am too lazy >right now - I found this link in a message in CSS_forum. > >Nevertheless I want to say that I share some thoughts you wrote in your >last message towards me concerning the match. > >Regards, >Günther Thanks Günther. What can I say? Let me keep it short too: I am happy that spin doctors like Frederic can cause hystery among many mass media, they can write many articles themselves, but they can't fool everybody. HAMBURGER ABENDBLATT is Boulevard. Why should Kramnik sue the Boulevard journalism? Because if he let it stand like this, heindirectly agreed?:) The point is not what Kramnik should do but more so what you should do while you're reading such articles...! You can take something printed for the truth. Or you could take it for a nasty insider uppercut / insinuation. Or you think for yourself. For me it's very unlikely if not more that Kramnik did not have the move on his board. That isn't the way he prepared himself, as a GM. Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.