Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 06:47:50 10/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 11, 2002 at 09:41:13, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 11, 2002 at 08:14:11, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On October 11, 2002 at 08:11:58, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On October 11, 2002 at 08:02:47, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>>On October 11, 2002 at 00:59:36, Slater Wold wrote: >>>> >>>>Slate, everyone recognizes that deep thought was an >>>>absolute beginner. Do you agree? >>> >>>No >>> >>>I did not say that deep thought was an absolute beginner. >>>I believe that everybody is going to disagree with you about it. >>> >>>I believe that everybody's opinion is that deep thought can beat most of the >>>humans of today. >>> >>>i believe that everybody's opinion is that Deep thought can achieve today more >>>than fide rating of 2000 against humans and beginners cannot do it. >> >>2000 is beginners level to me. >> >>Look deep thought: >> >>5k2/7R/4P2p/5K2/p1r2P1p/8/8/8 b LCTFIN04 (...h3!) >> >>what is movei playing here and what is its score? > >h5 -0.58/12,-1.15/13 >a3 -0.91/13 > >Iteration 13 was finished. > >It evaluates the position as clear advantage for white(I think that white is >winning and h3 cannot save black). > >Endgames is one of the main weakness of movei. >The only knowledge of it about endgame is to centralize the king. > >I did not improve movei in the last 2 months and the only changes that I do are >about supporting the analyze command and pondering by the winboard protocol. > >I still need to teach it to use hash tables for pruning. Deep thought at 3 minutes didn't find h3 here. Can you believe it? >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.