Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 09:30:21 10/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 11, 2002 at 00:25:27, K. Burcham wrote: > > >Robert, I know you are more qualified than most to have an opinion about this >comparison of Deep Blue to Deep Fritz. I know you have many reasons to have >formed this opinion. As you know I find the electrical/mechanical machine we >call Deep Blue very fascinating for its time. > >I have heard your comparisons about hardware, software, search depth, memory, >search methods, etc. that explains some of your reasoning about comparing Deep >Blue to todays programs. > >My question is, separate from all of this technical discussion, do you have >several moves that you have studied with todays programs that you know these >programs cannot find? >What have you found to be the most difficult of Deep Blues moves? >Would you please post your findings here for others to study? > No. The main reason is that I don't own any commercial programs of any kind and really wouldn't have a way to run them if I did since I am a unix-only person by choice. I _should_ have saved a few positions from games I saw them playing, but I did not. Someone should ask Hsu about the Nolot positions on real DB hardware, that might be interesting, for example. >thanks >kburcham
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.