Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 09:38:38 10/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 11, 2002 at 08:11:58, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 11, 2002 at 08:02:47, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On October 11, 2002 at 00:59:36, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>Slate, everyone recognizes that deep thought was an >>absolute beginner. Do you agree? > >No > >I did not say that deep thought was an absolute beginner. >I believe that everybody is going to disagree with you about it. > >I believe that everybody's opinion is that deep thought can beat most of the >humans of today. > >i believe that everybody's opinion is that Deep thought can achieve today more >than fide rating of 2000 against humans and beginners cannot do it. > >I decided to be careful and I believe that Deep thought can achieve a lot more >than fide rating of 2005 even if the programmers are only allowed to change the >opening book. > >Uri Just remember that deep thought produced a FIDE performance rating of > 2650 over 25 consecutive games vs GM players, in order to win the Fredkin Stage II prize. It didn't do that in secrecy, and all games were mandated to be 40/2 by the Fredkin prize committee...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.