Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 09:55:43 10/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 11, 2002 at 08:14:11, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On October 11, 2002 at 08:11:58, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 11, 2002 at 08:02:47, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On October 11, 2002 at 00:59:36, Slater Wold wrote: >>> >>>Slate, everyone recognizes that deep thought was an >>>absolute beginner. Do you agree? >> >>No >> >>I did not say that deep thought was an absolute beginner. >>I believe that everybody is going to disagree with you about it. >> >>I believe that everybody's opinion is that deep thought can beat most of the >>humans of today. >> >>i believe that everybody's opinion is that Deep thought can achieve today more >>than fide rating of 2000 against humans and beginners cannot do it. > >2000 is beginners level to me. > >Look deep thought: > >5k2/7R/4P2p/5K2/p1r2P1p/8/8/8 b LCTFIN04 (...h3!) I wouldn't call it lying but you try to make DT weaker than it really is by posting positions where the problem of the repetition recognition shows up. I call it manipulating people though. Not very scientific.. it more resembles a mud fight. Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.