Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:20:31 10/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 11, 2002 at 17:00:43, martin fierz wrote: >On October 11, 2002 at 00:25:27, K. Burcham wrote: > >>My question is, separate from all of this technical discussion, do you have >>several moves that you have studied with todays programs that you know these >>programs cannot find? > >perhaps it's more about moves that deep blue did not find: like h4? in game 1, I do not think that another move could change the result and I do not think that deeper blue could play better. I did not read that deeper blue had fortress detection in it's evaluation. >....b5? and ...Bf8? in game 2, or a3? and Nd5? in game 3 of DF-kramnik. >i think this DF match is a great example to show how useless the bickering about >some of DB's mistakes is: all programs make mistakes (at least now), just >different ones. if some of today's programs would not make the mistakes DB made >it doesn't mean they are better - they just make different mistakes... > >aloha > martin I do not say that it is a proof but only an evidence. The test against kramnik is biased because kramnik knows the specific weaknesses of deep fritz when Kasparov did not know the specific weaknesses of deeper blue. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.