Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: null-move vs non-null-move

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 19:46:38 10/11/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 11, 2002 at 13:39:29, Russell Reagan wrote:

>On October 11, 2002 at 13:15:28, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>I was just trying to answer the question:
>>
>>"what is the Elo improvement for a program that uses null-move over a program
>>that does
>>not, everything else being _identical_??"
>>
>>The last time I had tried this I got numbers between 50 and 100.  Seems to still
>>be the case,
>>if we are talking about longer games (not blitz).
>
>So what about a program like Junior that doesn't use null-move? If you added
>null-move to Junior, you might see zero improvement, or null-move might actually
>get in the way of other techniques. Obviously the improvement is either very
>small or there is none, or else I imagine it would be a part of Junior. So are
>we talking about...
>
>1. Programs that use null-move forward pruning and no other form of forward
>pruning.
>
>vs.
>
>2. The same program will null-move turned off.
>
>?
>
>Russell


I can't logically go that far...  Instead:

1.  Crafty with null-move on

vs

2.  crafty with null-move off.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.