Author: John Merlino
Date: 10:29:35 10/12/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 12, 2002 at 06:04:44, Rex wrote: >Ruffian results on a 1.533Ghz computer. > >00:00:01.2 18.15 8 1415595 Ne5+ Kb6 Bc5+ Qxc5 Nd7+ Ka7 Qxc5+ Ka8 >00:00:02.8 18.47 9 3368004 Ne5+ Kb6 Bc5+ Qxc5 Nd7+ Ka7 Qxc5+ Ka8 >00:00:06.3 18.74 10 7688982 Ne5+ Kb6 Bc5+ Qxc5 Nd7+ Ka7 Qxc5+ Ka8 >00:00:13.0 19.09 11 15529183 Ne5+ >00:00:16.7 Mate in 11 11 19957155 Ne5+ Kb6 Bc5+ Qxc5 Nd7+ Ka7 Qxc5+ Ka8 Qxc7 >Rhd8 Nb6+ Ka7 Na3 Rd6 Nxb5+ axb5 Nc8+ Ka8 Qa5+ Ra6 Qxa6+ Bxa6 Ra7# >00:00:36.8 Mate in 11 12 44015534 Ne5+ Kb6 Bc5+ Qxc5 Nd7+ Ka7 Qxc5+ Ka8 Qxc7 >Rhd8 Nb6+ Ka7 Na3 Rd6 Nxb5+ axb5 Nc8+ Ka8 Qa5+ Ra6 Qxa6+ Bxa6 Ra7# >00:01:39.7 Mate in 11 13 117956879 Ne5+ Kb6 Bc5+ Qxc5 Nd7+ Ka7 Qxc5+ Ka8 Qxc7 >Rhd8 Nb6+ Ka7 Na3 Rd6 Nxb5+ axb5 Nc8+ Ka8 Qa5+ Ra6 Qxa6+ Bxa6 Ra7# Chessmaster 9000, on a PIII-733 (since I'm at home), finds Mate in 12 in 1:04.... Time Depth Score Positions Moves 0:00 1/3 16.25 1948 1.Ne5+ Qxe5 2.Bxe5 Rhd8 3.Rxc7+ Kb6 4.Qc5+ Ka5 5.Qa3+ Kb6 6.Rxf7 0:00 1/4 15.95 10179 1.Ne5+ Qxe5 2.Bxe5 Rhd8 3.Qe4+ Rd5 4.Bxg7 0:00 1/5 17.47 58780 1.Ne5+ Kb6 2.Bc5+ Qxc5 3.Nd7+ Ka7 4.Qxc5+ Ka8 5.Nxb8 Rxb8 6.Qxc7 0:01 1/6 18.09 111671 1.Ne5+ Kb6 2.Bc5+ Qxc5 3.Nd7+ Ka7 4.Qxc5+ Ka8 5.Nxb8 Rxb8 6.Qxc7 b4 7.Rxf7 0:03 1/7 18.09 277981 1.Ne5+ Kb6 2.Bc5+ Qxc5 3.Nd7+ Ka7 4.Qxc5+ Ka8 5.Nxb8 Rxb8 6.Qxc7 b4 7.Rxf7 0:08 1/8 19.63 807078 1.Ne5+ Kb6 2.Bc5+ Qxc5 3.Nd7+ Ka7 4.Qxc5+ Ka8 5.Na3 Bxg2 6.Nxb8 Rxb8 7.Kxg2 Rc8 8.Qc6+ Kb8 9.Qxa6 0:22 1/9 20.39 2451949 1.Ne5+ Kb6 2.Bc5+ Qxc5 3.Nd7+ Ka7 4.Qxc5+ Ka8 5.Na3 Bf3 6.Nxb8 Rxb8 7.gxf3 Rc8 8.Qc6+ Kb8 9.Qxa6 1:04 1/10 Mate12 7658533 1.Ne5+ Kb6 2.Bc5+ Qxc5 3.Nd7+ Ka7 4.Qxc5+ Ka8 5.Na3 Bf3 6.Qxc7 Rb7 7.Qa5 Ka7 8.Nxb5+ Rxb5 9.Nc5+ Rb7 10.Qxa6+ Kb8 11.Rxb7+ Bxb7 12.Qxb7# 4:02 2/11 Mate12 27851982 1.Ne5+ Kb6 2.Bc5+ Qxc5 3.Nd7+ Ka7 4.Qxc5+ Ka8 5.Na3 Bf3 6.Qxc7 Rb7 7.Qa5 Ka7 8.Nxb5+ Rxb5 9.Nc5+ Ka8 10.Qxa6+ Kb8 11.Qa7+ Kc8 12.Qc7# <BEGIN CONSPIRACY THEORY> I see that Ruffian has the same "problem" as the Tigers, in that Mate in N reports are one move less than the actual number of moves. And the output format is very similar to the Tigers. Hmmmm..... <END CONSPIRACY THEORY> :-) jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.