Author: David Dahlem
Date: 10:03:54 10/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 13, 2002 at 12:33:20, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >ENGLISH >Comparison between CM_9000 default and CM_9000 X (a personality created by Kurt >Utzinger) >After having tested both versions we can say almost for sure that the >CM9_X-setting is considerable stronger. This special CM9K-personality only lost >one match vs Gambit Tiger 2.0 aggressive, which in our opinion is the strongest >Tiger version. With the default settings we played 343 games 40'/40 and higher >with a total score of 52 %. With the CM9K-X settings there were 390 games (13 >matches of 30 games at 40'/40) played with a score of 62 %. It should however >also be mentioned that we have not tested - and will not test - this strong >setting in blitz games. > >GERMAN >Dies stellt ein Vergleich dar zwischen CM_9000 Original-Einstellungen und >CM_9000 X, einer Persönlichkeit von Kurt Utzinger. Nach ausgiebigen Tests mit >vielen Partien wagen wir mit grosser Sicherheit zu behaupten, dass das CM_9000 X >Setting bedeutend stärker einzustufen ist als die originale CM_9000. Mit dem >speziellen Setting resultiert nach 390 Partien 40'/40 eine Gewinnquote von 62 %, >wobei nur das Match gegen Gambit Tiger 2 aggressiv (u.E. die stärkste >Tiger-Version überhaupt) knapp verloren ging. In der Original-Einstellung wurden >343 Partien gespielt mit einem Gesamtscore von immerhin noch 52 %, lässt man >aber hier die Amateure weg, so ergibt sich ein klares Minus mit 47 % (223 >games/104.5-118.5). > >playing conditions: >engine-engine-matches >GUI: Fritz7-/Hiarcs8 >ponder=off >4-men TB's >book=remis.ctg (no book learning) >time control = 40'/40+40'/40+40' (or higher, see below) >hardware/hashtables: see below > > >First of all the results of CM9K-default > > >TheKing 3.23 Program Games TheKing Opp Score Time Hardware/HT >TheKing 3.23 Aristarch 4.4 30 20.5 9.5 68% 40'/40 P3 650/32 >TheKing 3.23 Chess Tiger 14 30 12.5 17.5 42% 40'/40 Dur 1.3/64 >TheKing 3.23 Crafty 18.15 30 19 11 63% 40'/40 Dur 1.3/64 >TheKing 3.23 Fritz 7008 30 9 21 30% 40'/40 P3 800/32 >TheKing 3.23 GambitTiger2 ag 30 13.5 16.5 45% 40'/40 Ath 1.3/64 >TheKing 3.23 Hiarcs 8 30 20.5 9.5 68% 40'/40 Ath 1.3/64 >TheKing 3.23 Junior 7 30 14.5 15.5 48% 40'/40 Ath 1.3/64 >TheKing 3.23 Nimzo 7.32 30 15.5 14.5 52% 40'/40 Ath 1.3/64 >TheKing 3.23 Ruffian 1.0.0 30 16.5 13.5 55% 40'/40 P3 800/32 >TheKing 3.23 Shredder 6.02 13 5.5 7.5 42% 120'/60 Ath 1.3/64 >TheKing 3.23 Shredder 6.02 30 13.5 16.5 45% 40'/40 Ath 1.3/64 >TheKing 3.23 Yace 0.99.56 30 18.5 11.5 62% 40'/40 P3 650/32 >TheKing 3.23 Total 343 179 164 52% Various Various > > >And now the results of CM9_X: > >CM9 X Program Games CM9 X Opp Score Time Hardware/HT >CM9 X Aristarch 4.4 30 21.5 8.5 72% 40'/40 P3 650/32 >CM9 X Chess Tiger 14 30 18 12 60% 40'/40 Ath 1.3/64 >CM9 X Crafty 18.15 30 21.5 8.5 72% 40'/40 Dur 1.3/64 >CM9 X Fritz 7.0.0.8 30 16.5 13.5 55% 40'/40 Ath 1.3/64 >CM9 X GambitTiger2 ag 30 13 17 43% 40'/40 Ath 1.3/64 >CM9 X Hiarcs 7.32 30 17 13 57% 40'/40 P3 650/32 >CM9 X Hiarcs 8 30 16.5 13.5 55% 40'/40 P3 800/32 >CM9 X Junior 7 30 16.5 13.5 55% 40'/40 Dur 1.3/64 >CM9 X List 4.61 30 20.5 9.5 68% 40'/40 Ath 1.3/64 >CM9 X Nimzo 7.32 30 20.5 9.5 68% 40'/40 Ath 1.3/64 >CM9 X Ruffian 1.0.1 30 19.5 10.5 65% 40'/40 Ath 1.3/64 >CM9 X Shredder 6.02 30 18 12 60% 40'/40 Ath 1.3/64 >CM9 X Yace 0.99.56 30 21 9 70% 40'/40 Ath 1.3/64 >CM9 X Total 390 240 150 62% 40'/40 Various > > >Individual statistics: > >(1) CM9 X : 390 (+170,=140,- 80), 61.5 % > >Aristarch 4.4 : 30 (+ 17,= 9,- 4), 71.7 % >Crafty 18.15 : 30 (+ 17,= 9,- 4), 71.7 % >Chess Tiger 14 : 30 (+ 11,= 14,- 5), 60.0 % >Fritz 7008 : 30 (+ 9,= 15,- 6), 55.0 % >Gambit Tiger 2 ag : 30 (+ 7,= 12,- 11), 43.3 % >Hiarcs 7.32 : 30 (+ 11,= 12,- 7), 56.7 % >Hiarcs 8 : 30 (+ 11,= 11,- 8), 55.0 % >Junior 7 : 30 (+ 15,= 3,- 12), 55.0 % >List 4.61 : 30 (+ 14,= 13,- 3), 68.3 % >Nimzo 7.32 : 30 (+ 15,= 11,- 4), 68.3 % >Ruffian 1.0.1 : 30 (+ 13,= 13,- 4), 65.0 % >Shredder 6.02 : 30 (+ 14,= 8,- 8), 60.0 % >Yace 0.99.56 : 30 (+ 16,= 10,- 4), 70.0 % > > >Games : 390 (finished) > >White Wins : 145 (37.2 %) >Black Wins : 105 (26.9 %) >Draws : 140 (35.9 %) >Unfinished : 0 > >White Perf. : 55.1 % >Black Perf. : 44.9 % > >ECO A = 72 Games (18.5 %) >ECO B = 80 Games (20.5 %) >ECO C = 67 Games (17.2 %) >ECO D = 113 Games (29.0 %) >ECO E = 58 Games (14.9 %) > >INTERESTING REMARKS / INTERESSANTE ANMERKUNGEN >The course of the single matches divided into 3 x 10 games / Verlauf der >einzelnen Matches, unterteilt in je 3 x 10 Partien: > >CM9 X vs Aristarch 4.4 >Games 01-10 = 4.5 - 5.5 >Games 11-20 = 9.0 - 1.0 >Games 21-30 = 8.0 - 2.0 > > >CM9 X vs Crafty 18.15 >Games 01-10 = 6.0 - 4.0 >Games 11-20 = 7.0 - 3.0 >Games 21-30 = 8.5 - 1.5 > > >CM9 X vs Chess Tiger 14.0 >Games 01-10 = 5.5 - 4.5 >Games 11-20 = 7.0 - 3.0 >Games 21-30 = 5.5 - 4.5 > > >CM9 X vs Fritz 7.0.0.8 >Games 01-10 = 6.0 - 4.0 >Games 11-20 = 7.0 - 3.0 >Games 21-30 = 3.5 - 6.5 > > >CM9 X vs Gambit Tiger 2 aggressive >Games 01-10 = 4.5 - 5.5 >Games 11-20 = 4.5 - 5.5 >Games 21-30 = 4.0 - 6.0 > > >CM9 X vs Hiarcs 7.32 >Games 01-10 = 7.0 - 3.0 >Games 11-20 = 6.0 - 4.0 >Games 21-30 = 4.0 - 6.0 > > >CM9 X vs Hiarcs 8 >Games 01-10 = 5.0 - 5.0 >Games 11-20 = 5.0 - 5.0 >Games 21-30 = 6.5 - 3.5 > > >CM9 X vs Junior 7 >Games 01-10 = 6.5 - 3.5 >Games 11-20 = 2.5 - 7.5 >Games 21-30 = 7.5 - 2.5 > > >CM9 X vs List 4.61 >Games 01-10 = 6.0 - 4.0 >Games 11-20 = 7.0 - 3.0 >Games 21-30 = 7.5 - 2.5 > > >CM9 X vs Nimzo 7.32 >Games 01-10 = 8.0 - 2.0 >Games 11-20 = 6.0 - 4.0 >Games 21-30 = 6.5 - 3.5 > > >CM9 X vs Ruffian 1.0.1 >Games 01-10 = 6.5 - 3.5 >Games 11-20 = 7.0 - 3.0 >Games 21-30 = 6.0 - 4.0 > > >CM9 X vs Shredder 6.02 >Games 01-10 = 7.5 - 2.5 >Games 11-20 = 5.0 - 5.0 >Games 21-30 = 5.5 - 4.5 > > >CM9 X vs Yace 0.99.56 >Games 01-10 = 6.5 - 3.5 >Games 11-20 = 7.0 - 3.0 >Games 21-30 = 7.5 - 2.5 > > >ENGLISH: If we only took into consideration the worst series of CM9_X in the 13 >matches the corresponding cross table would look as follows / DEUTSCH: Wenn wir >nur die jeweils schlechteste Serie von CM9_X bei allen 13 Matches >berücksichtigen, sähe die Tabelle wie folgt aus: > >Individual statistics: >Worst case scenario for CM9_X > >(8) CM9 X : 130 (+ 43,= 43,- 44), 49.6 % > >Aristarch 4.4 : 10 (+ 3,= 3,- 4), 45.0 % >Crafty 18.15 : 10 (+ 4,= 4,- 2), 60.0 % >Chess Tiger 14 : 10 (+ 3,= 5,- 2), 55.0 % >Fritz 7008 : 10 (+ 1,= 5,- 4), 35.0 % >Gambit Tiger 2 ag : 10 (+ 3,= 2,- 5), 40.0 % >Hiarcs 7.32 : 10 (+ 3,= 2,- 5), 40.0 % >Hiarcs 8 : 10 (+ 4,= 2,- 4), 50.0 % >Junior 7 : 10 (+ 2,= 1,- 7), 25.0 % >List 4.61 : 10 (+ 4,= 4,- 2), 60.0 % >Nimzo 7.32 : 10 (+ 4,= 4,- 2), 60.0 % >Ruffian 1.0.1 : 10 (+ 4,= 4,- 2), 60.0 % >Shredder 6.02 : 10 (+ 4,= 2,- 4), 50.0 % >Yace 0.99.56 : 10 (+ 4,= 5,- 1), 65.0 % > >Conclusion / Schlussfolgerung > >ENGLISH: A good example to demonstrate how important it is to play as much games >as possible, in any case, matches over 10 games only are not sufficient to prove >anything. / DEUTSCH: Ein gutes Beispiel, das zeigt, wie wichtig es ist, eine >genügend Anzahl Partien zu spielen. Auf jeden Fall genügen Matches zu je 10 >Partien nicht. > >The games in PGN-format can be downloaded at ... (address to follow) / Die >Partien im PGN-Format können bei ... (Adresse folgt) heruntergeladen werden. > >Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.