Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: K blunders..does this change the game significantly?

Author: Mark Young

Date: 10:40:52 10/13/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 13, 2002 at 13:02:20, Fernando Villegas wrote:

>It doesn't. K was already busted. Nobody survives an ending with one pawn less
>againts a top program, except in some very rares technical cases.
>Fernando

I think you may be right about the position not being drawn. It would not be
easy to save that position playing against Deep Fritz. Computers tend to play
this type of position Q P ending better then humans. Kramnik knew he was in for
a long ending that at best he could only draw. This had to effect his mind set
somewhat. It may have been easier for him take this out. This way he could claim
it was a blunder, and the position was most likely a dead draw without having to
prove it over the board. Were he knew one slip in this type of position would
bring a quick end. This would save face is some way for him, because now Deep
Fritz can only claim a flawed win in some peoples mind.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.