Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 19:00:01 10/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 13, 2002 at 10:21:05, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On October 13, 2002 at 10:05:38, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>But not on an 8-way using the fusion chipset. the quads scale well due to 4->way memory interleaving. The 8-way still uses 4-way interleaving ahd produces >>a significant memory bottleneck... > >Want to bet that, when actualy efficiency is not a consideration, >I can design a parallel system that scales well _in NPS_ no matter >what memory bandwidth is available? I'll take that bet, so long as it is a _real_ parallel search using shared memory. Note that we are talking about a real chess program. Not some junk thing that just searches the same stuff everywhere... IE something comparable to Fritz. > >I could start by not sharing the hashtables. > >You get the idea... > No I don't, because we are talking about _fritz_ here. A _real_ parallel search engine. Nobody in their right mind would do that unless forced to do so due to some oddball constraint having nothing to do with chess. >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.