Author: Tina Long
Date: 21:27:20 10/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 13, 2002 at 23:24:37, Terry McCracken wrote: >On October 13, 2002 at 21:44:24, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On October 13, 2002 at 14:46:06, Peter McKenzie wrote: >> >>>Kramnik's blunder looks worse to me. >>>Its so bad that I'm sure the game was *not* fixed! >>> >>>Peter >> >> >>No, it just means that Vincent won't take the match serious at all now. >> >>"Kramnik played at 2000 level" is the next thing I expect to see from him. >> >>:) >> >>Remember, he said that Kramnik would win "chanceless" (whatever that means) >>as "he will not play like patzer Kasparov played in the 1997 match." >> >>:) > >ROTFL! > >Poor Vincent... And we have yet to hear from the German "statistician" who predicted no losses to Kramnik and was patting himself on the back here after game 2. On 22 September 2002 I sent an EMail to a friend (verifiable) which included: "I'm sticking with my assesment of: Kramnik 1, 1, .5, .5, .5, .5, 0 (oops!), .5 " a little out in the timing, but not a bad prediction so far eh!! I wonder how nervous Kramnik will be tomorrow. Cheers Guys Tina Long
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.