Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 23:58:25 10/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 14, 2002 at 00:27:20, Tina Long wrote: >On October 13, 2002 at 23:24:37, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On October 13, 2002 at 21:44:24, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On October 13, 2002 at 14:46:06, Peter McKenzie wrote: >>> >>>>Kramnik's blunder looks worse to me. >>>>Its so bad that I'm sure the game was *not* fixed! >>>> >>>>Peter >>> >>> >>>No, it just means that Vincent won't take the match serious at all now. >>> >>>"Kramnik played at 2000 level" is the next thing I expect to see from him. >>> >>>:) >>> >>>Remember, he said that Kramnik would win "chanceless" (whatever that means) >>>as "he will not play like patzer Kasparov played in the 1997 match." >>> >>>:) >> >>ROTFL! >> >>Poor Vincent... > > >And we have yet to hear from the German "statistician" who predicted no losses >to Kramnik and was patting himself on the back here after game 2. > >On 22 September 2002 I sent an EMail to a friend (verifiable) which included: > >"I'm sticking with my assesment of: >Kramnik 1, 1, .5, .5, .5, .5, 0 (oops!), .5 " > >a little out in the timing, but not a bad prediction so far eh!! > >I wonder how nervous Kramnik will be tomorrow. > >Cheers Guys >Tina Long LOL! He should have switched doors!!;-) Cheers, Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.