Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:14:54 10/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 13, 2002 at 21:51:41, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On October 13, 2002 at 11:16:29, Chris Taylor wrote: > >>On October 13, 2002 at 11:12:30, Mustafa wrote: >> >>>I think a GM who plays that good can never blunder like this he knew that Ne7+ >>>would win the game for white still he played that Queen move i think this game >>>was fixed and kramnik knew that he will lose this game and fritz will win anyone >>>do also think the same way do i. >> >>Guess it shows that Humans, can be Human too?? >> >>So, I agree with you, sort of............ >> >>When did Kramnik last blunder, against a Human player? Answers on a post-card!! >> >>Chris > > >The point should be this: > >(1) when did he last blunder (and) >(2) when did his opponent notice? > >That is a completely different question. > >I find it hard to believe any conspiracy theories here. He made a mistake that >might >not be obvious, and the computer jumped on it. End of story. It happened in >the DB >match. It happened in this match. I have seen GM players make such mistakes in >major >events more than once, and in fact, I have seen them hang a piece and their >opponent >didn't even notice. 2 points: 1)Kramnik is not the average GM but better than it. 2)Kramnik was not in serious time trouble(less than 1 minute per move) and the question is how many mistakes do GM's when they have average time of more than 1 minutes per move and I do not talk about tactical mistake of not seeing something that a computer needs 4-5 plies to see because this can be seen by computers in 1-2 plies. Don't expect that kind of inattention from a computer, of >course. computers may do even bigger mistakes and the reason is simply bugs. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.