Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Corrections on Kramnik's "blunder" (Only for chess insiders)

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 05:01:19 10/14/02


[Since I write from abroad I must use the AOL account, so please do not
speculate! Thanks.]

I've read quite a few statements about the 5th game, whether it should have been
"fixed" or not and even Bob took part with the sophisticated differentiation
that blunder or not, we had to realise the point that an opponent had do
"notice" presence of the blunder after all...

That is all completely uninteresting!

Perhaps it could help the debate about fixed or not-fixed if I give here a quote
from Kramnik himself and then the "experts" here have new food to think.

1. (Quotes by heart) "I checked the coming endgame after the loss of the pawn b7
and saw no solution for me, then I thought I could simply exchange the Knights,
but immediately I saw that I would then lose a piece!"

2. "So then I went back to the endgame, but couldn't look through to a safe
draw. Then I came back to the exchange idea and made the move (Qc4)."

Here not the exact wording is important but only the process of decision finding
in 4 steps. Kramnik said it this way on the press conference.


From these rather strange explanations I wrote some kind of brutal, because
reveiling, analysis about the situation Kramnik is in after the report of Eric
Schiller, who proved Kramnik wrong with his statement that Fritz had been
qualified in a "tournament" before etc. Now it must be clear for Kramnik that
he's just the tool for a PR action for ChessBase. I compared his "blunder" with
the 6th game in 1997 when Kasparov should have confused the move h6 in the
opening. Insiders knew then and know by now that GM like Kasparov and Kramnik
the two best GM actually, would never make such mistakes. So such "blunders" are
more a way to express revulsion and contempt. Bobby Fischer always prefered to
leave or at least to not to play. But the modern way is just more sophisticated.
Because it's telling the smart insiders...

In my 11th mosaic I wrote about "Realitätsverlust" (loss of reality) and in
Smarttalk I explained the alleged "blunder by Kramnik". There is the correct
German wording from the press conference. Both articles in German unfortunately.
If I have the time I will add a little translation later on.

http://hometown.aol.de/rolftueschen/11.html
http://hometown.aol.de/rolftueschen/SmallTalk.html

Rolf Tueschen




This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.