Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Q&A with Feng-Hsiung Hsu

Author: James Swafford

Date: 09:39:50 10/14/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 14, 2002 at 12:09:25, Uri Blass wrote:

>On October 14, 2002 at 10:06:39, James Swafford wrote:
>
>>On October 14, 2002 at 09:44:06, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>
>>>On October 14, 2002 at 07:05:42, Dave Gomboc wrote:
>>>
>>>>On October 13, 2002 at 15:35:12, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On October 13, 2002 at 14:40:12, James Swafford wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>I wonder why. there is just one person ever in this whole
>>>>>planet who said 12(6) = 18 ply, and that's robert hyatt.
>>>>
>>>>Bullshit -- I said this years ago, after asking a member of the DB team.
>>>
>>>>Hsu just said it himself too:
>>>
>>>>EeEk(* DM) kibitzes: next question: Seems like people wants to know
>>>>what the exact meaning of ""12(6)" in the Deep Blue log files, can you
>>>>explain this?
>>>>CrazyBird(DM) kibitzes: 12(6) means 12 plies of brute force (not
>>>>counting the search extensions & quiescence).
>>>
>>>by definition this means: it was 12 ply not counting search extensions
>>>and qsearch. of course hardware search is part of that.
>>>
>>>>CrazyBird(DM) kibitzes: 6 means the maximum hardware search depth
>>>>allowed.
>>>
>>>that's part of that 12 ply. If you interpret it different then that's
>>>your problem and wrong.
>>>
>>>'brute force search' is everything including hardware. In fact hsu
>>>even specified it for the technical gifted that it is just
>>>EXCLUDING qsearch and excluding extensions.
>>>
>>>>CrazyBird(DM) kibitzes: this means that the PV could be up to 6 plies
>>>>deeper before quiescence.
>>>
>>>*possibly* if it prints (6), the logs clearly show that 5(6) doesn't
>>>show a 5 ply mainline. but < 5
>>>
>>>>Apparently that's not clear enough for you?  The PV can be up to 6 plies
>>>>_deeper_.  Deeper than what?  Than the software search of 12 plies, of course!
>>>
>>>Which country do you get from, his statement is very clear.
>>>
>>>Later it was repeated even to show the full logfile here not leaving
>>>away a single line after when the question is asked:
>>>
>>>----
>>>EeEk(DM) kibitzes: kib question from ardee: Does "12(6)" mean 12 total ply or
>>>12+6=18 total ply?  This has the been source of huge arguments for years!
>>>aics%
>>>CrazyBird(DM) kibitzes: 12 total in terms of brute force. 6 is just the max
>>>partition in hardware.
>>>aics%
>>>EeEk(DM) kibitzes: question from parabola444:  You mentioned Deep Blue searched
>>>about 12 plies brute force + extensions, which is similar to what pc programs
>>>these days get on a fast pc - since Deep Blue hardware was much faster, how come
>>>it didn't search significantly deeper ?
>>>aics%
>>>CrazyBird(DM) kibitzes: to all the book readers, if you do like the book, please
>>>tell your friends would might be interested. thanks.
>>>aics%
>>>----
>>>So it is clear his answer was very clear : it is 12 ply.
>>>
>>>So is it clear now?
>>>
>>>Apart from that. For 18 ply you would need to see squareroot(40^18)
>>>nodes to search it using fullwidth. That's a minimal tree, excluding
>>>qsearch and other overhead.
>>>
>>>You really believed all that time that
>>>deep blue searched 40^9 = 262144000000000 nodes ?
>>
>>Where do you get 40?  Is that something they published, or you came
>>up with?  I think 35-36 would be more accurate.
>
>35^9 is also something that they could not search.
>I assume it is 35 if you do not like 40.
>>
>>Also, you're assuming they aren't doing any decent move ordering.
>>You know as well as anyone it's possible to bring your effective
>>branching factor to something less than sqrt(bf).
>
>No
>
>sqrt(35^18)=35^9 is after you have perfect move ordering
>and it is known that nobody has perfect move ordering.

You're right... 35^9 is the minimal tree, _assuming_ you're
not hashing or pruning.

--
James



>
>Hash tables can help but it seems that they do not use it effectively and
>even if they could be 10 times faster thanks to hash tables
>35^9/10 is still impossible.
>
>Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.