Author: Mike S.
Date: 10:58:04 10/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 14, 2002 at 08:01:19, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >(...) >From these rather strange explanations I wrote some kind of brutal, because >reveiling, analysis about the situation Kramnik is in after the report of Eric >Schiller, who proved Kramnik wrong with his statement that Fritz had been >qualified in a "tournament" before etc. Do you really think that Kramnik takes any notice of the Schiller website and what's published there? Or that he even cares for details of the qualifying process? >Now it must be clear for Kramnik that >he's just the tool for a PR action for ChessBase. Easy to say now, after Fritz has won a game. If Fritz couldn't win a game, you could as well say Fritz was a tool for Kramnik's PR action, applying the same view. How would you organise a Man vs. Machine event and NOT having some people say "It's a PR action" (they of course mean, *only* PR)?? Play against an unknown mediocre Grandmaster in a secret bunker with no media coverage at all? Of course every activity which gets many media reports has a PR aspect. Is it a SIN? Would you prefer chess and computer chess NEVER being in mass media? Regards, M.Scheidl
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.