Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 18:39:43 10/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 14, 2002 at 09:44:06, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >So it is clear his answer was very clear : it is 12 ply. > >So is it clear now? No, it's 12 ply _in_software_, why that isn't clear to you, I don't know. >Apart from that. For 18 ply you would need to see squareroot(40^18) >nodes to search it using fullwidth. That's a minimal tree, excluding >qsearch and other overhead. > >You really believed all that time that >deep blue searched 40^9 = 262144000000000 nodes ? The 18 ply is not full-width. Don't be an idiot. >It is very obvious now that one of the deep blue team members has >spreaded misinformation to you and to Hyatt. So now you're calling him a liar? Vincent, I have heard more than enough out of you over the years, but calling the guy a liar is beyond pathetic. >Note that they spreaded during the match more misinformation. For >example they said that during the KRRPPP KRRPP endgame of kasparov, >where deep blue managed to draw in a neat way, >that deep blue played it perfect because the whole endgame was >in its EGTBs. B.S. They never said such a thing. Dave
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.