Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 09:34:27 10/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 15, 2002 at 12:08:08, Jorge wrote: >Hello Kurt, > >I set CM9_X to play 5 games at time 5 min/G with the default CM9000, and so far >it is getting crushed 5-0 in favor of CM9000. Is CM9_X set best for longer time >controls? I relealize that 5 games is nothing, but may i should try a longer >time per game or move. > > >regards, >jorge Hello Jorge You are right, 5 games at 5m/g are statistically spoken nothing. As earlier mentioned I have not tested (and am not going to do so) CM9_Utz12n at lower time controls than 40'/40. I have never had interest in blitz games and furthermore I consider matches between CM9-personalities (or e.g. Hiarcs732 vs Hiarcs8) to be rather worthless. For me only matches vs other programs do count. By the way, CM9_Utz12n has reached fifth place of 124 tested chess programs in the so called WM-test of Manfred Meiler, behind some Fritz-versions but better than all other top engines. Please have a look at http://f23.parsimony.net/forum50826/messages/51271.htm Kind regards Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.