Author: Chris Carson
Date: 12:47:05 10/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 15, 2002 at 15:28:02, Chris Carson wrote: >On October 15, 2002 at 12:50:10, Mark Young wrote: > >>On October 15, 2002 at 12:42:09, Chris Carson wrote: >> >>>On October 15, 2002 at 12:37:38, Chris Carson wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>Comp TPR Opp W D L T >>>>DB97 2862 2795 +2 =3 -1 6 >>>>DF02 2807 2807 +2 =2 -2 6 (with two games to go) >>>>DB96 2642 2775 +1 =2 -3 6 >>>> >>>>DF will have a TPR between 2707 and 2907 depending on the result of the last two >>>>games! >>> >>>Note: GM Kramnik had preparation with DF before the match, GM Kasparov did not >>>have that with DB. This match has plenty of rest time for the GM as well. DF >>>now has two wins over a GM rated 2600+. This is the highest rated GM to ever >>>lose to a computer (GM Kasparov was only 2795 at the time DB97 won two games, GM >>>Kasparov is rated higher now, but not at the time of the DB97 match). >> >> >>When was the last time GM Kramnik lost 2 games in a row at 40/2hr? I know he is >>tough to beat going like 80 games at one point without a loss. > >Good question, I am not sure. We now have 5 programs at 40/2 to achieve a >higher TPR than DB96: Rebel, Tiger, Junior, DF6 and now DF8. Tiger and Rebel >did it on single processor machines. The Rebel GM (2700) had 100 preparation >games and ofcourse we know GM Kramnik had lots of preparation against DF8. >These are much tougher conditions than DB96/97 encountered and the GM has a >higher rating. I guess one more note: DF is running at 6Mnps. DB96 ran at 100Mnps and DB97 tran at 200Mnps (even faster for some positions).
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.