Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:19:18 10/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 15, 2002 at 17:55:27, Rick Terry wrote: > > > Why? Because it made a move not even a 1500 elo player would make in game 2 >when it played it's bishop back to the F8 square. Do I really believe this?? >ofcourse not!! But this is the kind of rediculous Logic used by Hyatt and others >to Prove Fritz is not a Grandmaster!! It can beat Kramnnik two games straight >and draw 2, but it isn't a Grandmaster because it makes weak , rediculous moves >at times, Beautiful Logic!!!! I do not think that hyatt used bad moves of computers as a proof that they are not grandmaster strength. If you use that logic to claim that comps are not gM strength then you can continue and say that they are not IM strength and not FM and not 1900 strength. I see no reason to stop at GM strength Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.