Author: Rick Terry
Date: 16:40:50 10/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 15, 2002 at 18:44:00, martin fierz wrote: >On October 15, 2002 at 17:55:27, Rick Terry wrote: > >> >> >> Why? Because it made a move not even a 1500 elo player would make in game 2 >>when it played it's bishop back to the F8 square. Do I really believe this?? >>ofcourse not!! But this is the kind of rediculous Logic used by Hyatt and others >>to Prove Fritz is not a Grandmaster!! It can beat Kramnnik two games straight >>and draw 2, but it isn't a Grandmaster because it makes weak , rediculous moves >>at times, Beautiful Logic!!!! > >let's see, who should i believe? hyatt, or a 15-year old kid (just a guess, i >admit) who knows nothing about either chess or computer programming... hmm... >tough decision :-) I would go with the 15-year old kid if the other view went against fundemntal logic and common sense. Unless ofcourse I was a weak minded pile of Poop like you. By the way is everyone who disagrees with the all-knowing all-seeing godlike hyatt himself a 15 year old kid?? Sounds like somemore insane logic to me, pretty common here huh?
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.