Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: OT: On the CCC Charter - and the highly paid moderators :)

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 19:24:05 10/15/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 12, 2002 at 09:51:58, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>On October 12, 2002 at 04:19:36, David Dory wrote:
[snip]
>>I don't have any trouble when someone like Vincent says "that idea is shit", but
>>posts that say "<someone> is full of shit" and other direct name-calling, are
>>simply outside the charter, and shouldn't be tolerated, IMO.
>>
>>David
>
>
>Do you _really_ take most of what he says seriously?  I don't.  I always try to
>"consider the source"...

Vincent is one of the interesting posters here.  He knows a lot about chess and
also about computer chess.  His thinking seems very polarized to me:
Either an idea is pure excrement or it is a chocolate eclair, and nothing
in-between.

Now, he goes off on tangents at times.  So do I.  I tend to be wildly
enthusiastic about things that others take very little interest in.  I think
what I am trying to say is that we all have different personalities.  After a
while, we recognize whether someone is 'in character' or not.

Personally, I don't mind the new bunch of wild posters we have here.  It makes
the forum interesting to me.  I do think the volume has become a bit much to
find articles of interest, but at least it is not dying from lack of interest.

I think Prof. Hyatt is very even handed about when to apply discipline, and
astonishingly so when the attacks are directed at him.  I have *never* seen him
delete any post that was mocking him unless complaints were received about it
(and in most cases someone else deleted it anyway).

The forms *were* broken.  That is not the fault of the moderators.  I also do
not blame Steve or the ICD staff.  After all, they have a business to run and
CCC is just a free service they run.  If something needs attention on CCC, I
imagine that it will get solved after real business problems are not choking the
queue.

IOW -- I don't see any serious problems and I don't think any of the moderators
have been inattentive.

I can guarantee you that I read only a small percentage of the posts and
considering the announcement by Steve of the record volume -- I expect that the
same is true for everyone else here.

I have even received complaints that the volume is too large on the board.  But
what can we do about that -- talk about dull stuff?
;-)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.