Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Deep Fritz7 is not Grandmaster Strength.

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 19:35:09 10/15/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 15, 2002 at 22:21:04, Rick Terry wrote:
[snip]
>  Ok Dann I am 38 years old, but believe me based on your reply's here I know
>for a fact you are younger,

45.

> also i can see you don't have a wide experience with
>a variety of different people.,

You obvously know nothing at all about me. ;-)

>you probally spent most of your adult years in a
>university.

4 of them. That's about 9% of my life.

>Life teaches you far more then any University can ever teach my
>friend believe that.

Some people learn slower than others.

>As to spelling I don't take this forum or any other site on
>the internet seriously enough to check my every word for spelling, but I think
>it is wildly specultive of someone to  to imply that I can't spell or am very
>young, I can't think of a million reasons why someone could spell badly with
>nothing to do with intelligence or maturity.

All the reasons below are related to intelligence or maturity.

>Sorry but I can't take you serious
>here, I don't believe you actually believe your own words, surely you can see
>how rediculous these assumptions are. Some reasons for bad spelling.....

Systematic error, I see.

>
>1. Poor typing skills

Lack of physical maturity and slow learning capacity.

>2. Lazyness to correct errors based on long day at work

Lazyness is related to immaturity and low intelligence, in my view.

>3. a few beers too many

Lack of intelligence, again.

>4. sommeone gets excited and in a hurry and overlooks typo's.

Emotional immaturity.

>5. The forum is just not that important to the indivisual to take painstaking
>steps to insure spelling perfection.

Lack of diligence is a sign of immaturity no matter where it surfaces.  Anything
worth doing is worth doing well.  If you are incapable of doing a good job, then
why bother?

>6. Person thinks CONTENT is more important then quality of spelling.

Do you imagine that excellence of content has been demonstrated?

>Personally I think people that point out typo's are very petty and cynical. I
>have to much to do and to think about rather then sweat someone on the small
>stuff. No one here is perfect.

Certainly nobody has reached a state of perfection.  That does not mean that
striving for excellence is a bad idea.  I have found that quality of content is
almost always directly proportional to excellence in other areas such as
spelling, humor, etc.  A very poorly punctuated post with foul language in it is
(to me) symptomatic of a general malise and it will be unlikely to find
excellence from that source in the future.  Of course, I have been pleasantly
surprised on many occastions.  It is also true that for many this forum is in a
language which is not their first or even second language.  In such an instance,
I can only admire their tremendous efforts to communicate in a tongue not their
own.  In fact, many do achieve an elegance -- despite the fact that they are
speaking in a language for which they have a mastery far below that of their
native tongue.  It makes me wonder what sort of eloquence they could impart to
me in their native tongue if only I understood it.

Bottom line:
Sloppy posting, sloppy ideas, sloppy everything.  Usually, they go hand and
foot.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.