Author: Sally Weltrop
Date: 23:27:41 10/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 16, 2002 at 00:08:17, Ricardo R Santana wrote: >Ok. It's not that complicate to understand Kramnik could beat Deep Fritz easily >. Just see the first 2 games...But what happens then ? Kramnik lost two games..a >great blunder and now this ?? I am sure soon or later we will see in Deep Fritz >box: the program who beats world champion bla bla bla. It's disgusting... > >All you have to understand is something like this: Deep Fritz is weak and this >we can see in the games where Kramnik played an inferior ending to win the >game....and second: Kramnik now is richer !!!! I TOTALLY agree. It's just marketing PR. If it was winner gets 75% of prize fund you would see much different results. The GK-Junior match will be much more interesting as GK has a point to prove and he has to crush Junior as if he does not he will have to hang his head in shame a second time!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.