Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 02:00:53 10/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 16, 2002 at 03:47:01, Vladimir Medvedev wrote: >In his online interview Mr. CrazyBird told that DB did not use nullmoving >because it is not compatible with singular extensions. Could somebody explain >what are "singular" extensions (which difference with general meaning of >extensions technique? Are singular extensions used only for one move in the >node, while "common" - for all moves from the node? ) Singular extensions means extending a move if it is the only 'good' one in a position, for example if it is better than all other by half a pawn. >Why are they incompatible with nullmoving? I have no idea what CB was thinking about. I use them, and I use nullmove, and it works fine. -- GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.