Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 02:24:11 10/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 16, 2002 at 04:42:06, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On October 16, 2002 at 03:48:02, bryan whitby wrote: > >>I can remember years and years ago when Fidelity fixed the results of their >>multiple entries into the then World Microcomputer Chess Championships. Their >>operators would resign in won positions, just to let their leading chess >>computer win the game and gain more points. So cheating in computer chess has >>been with us for many years. > > >Some of you admit that Rebel on a single processor can defeat a 2700 rated >player, without having so many negatives remarks. But when Frans finally >accomplished, what some of you thought that it was almost impossible, by >dedicating himself almost 1.5 years in refining his program to play Anti Human >such: as avoiding closed position etc..., and finally when he accomplished it; >all that you can think of is marketing fraud. I don't think that Kramnik is that >type of person who can sell his pride and lower his self esteem for several >thousand dollars more than what he could have gained by simply beating >Deep Fritz. What you are forgetting is that Kramnik is human. Humans makes >mistakes specially under presurre. When two human are playing each other they >make mistakes too, but the winner is always the one that makes the least >mistakes during the game. Kramnik simply thought that he could create a >beautiful combination, which most of the time works against other human, simply >because another human player most of the time don't find the best defense under >presure, but this is where computer shine in position where pure calculating >power and perfect defense is required. Poor Kramnik forgot that he can't afford >to try for a long combination going for the brilliancy prize, unless he is 100% >sure that there is no possible defense against his long tactical attack. He >simply forgot that at that moment he was playing a computer that doesn't becomes >fatigue and will always find the best and only possible defense. > >Pichard. I admire your new logic. As if Kramnik gets more dollars if he lets win the computer. Of course he gets less dollars. But that is for a good purpose. The chess education of children! In Germany and the orphanage in Bahrain where Kramnik is living since Monday. I can't speak here in public, but if you want to know what the Mossad agent has told me, then read the following secret report. Yes, you are right. Vladdy is a poor guy. http://hometown.aol.de/rolftueschen/topsecret.html (The photo material is a compilation of what "they" let me look at. But please keep away all your children and women! The truth could cause damages! And please lets pray for him who is now someone else but no longer the chess genius!) Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.