Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 02:56:07 10/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 16, 2002 at 05:00:53, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On October 16, 2002 at 03:47:01, Vladimir Medvedev wrote: > >>In his online interview Mr. CrazyBird told that DB did not use nullmoving >>because it is not compatible with singular extensions. Could somebody explain >>what are "singular" extensions (which difference with general meaning of >>extensions technique? Are singular extensions used only for one move in the >>node, while "common" - for all moves from the node? ) > >Singular extensions means extending a move if it is the only 'good' >one in a position, for example if it is better than all other by >half a pawn. > >>Why are they incompatible with nullmoving? > >I have no idea what CB was thinking about. I use them, and >I use nullmove, and it works fine. > >-- don't you think that much resources got wasted by SEX ? >GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.