Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 15:29:43 10/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 16, 2002 at 18:16:09, Wayne Lowrance wrote: >I do not wish to speculate, too much of that goin on now. I will just restate >that the rules still piss me off and the super GM has dissapointed me which I am >still in doub't about the strength of the super programs. > >I guess what it will take to make me satisfied is something close to the >following: > >1) No advanced information given to the GM, he is on his own. >2) Winner take all excepting of course expenses >3) Fide Rules apply >4) No game postponments, game every other day. >5) Computer operator given freedom to tweak the program, not during the match, >he has to leave it on it's own . If the thing crashes, it looses, if it is a >communication link problem then the clocks stop until it is fixed. (ouch) > >Just my take, too strict ? These are pretty similar to the rules of the 1997 Kasparov-DB match...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.