Author: martin fierz
Date: 17:27:57 10/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 16, 2002 at 17:57:10, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On October 16, 2002 at 17:53:25, Jeremiah Penery wrote: > >>On October 16, 2002 at 16:43:53, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>I find it tasteless that Hsu claims that Deep Blue was in a 'different >>>class' from Fritz and that it was not match for them, when he has no >>>ability to back it up and the only public things we have about the two >>>show differently. >> >>How do they show differently? > >'very old' Fritz beat 'very old' Deep Blue ...and in a shveshnikov book line at that which was in the fritz book and not in the DB book AFAIK. using one game alone as a proof is not a good idea. and if that game was decided by the better opening book, then it gets downright ridiculous. aloha martin >Granted, it's not the same as 'new' Fritz and 'new' Deep Blue, >but considering this is the only thing they have to show, I'm >taking Hsu's opionion with a few beaches of salt. > >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.