Author: Martin Bauer
Date: 23:51:17 10/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 16, 2002 at 19:02:44, Antonio Dieguez wrote: >Just one thingy, I supose you are looking and probing the position right in the >hashtable in respect to extensions. Normally one would look in the hash after >doing the extension(i guess is normal) but may be you are doing something to >save the pos wih the right depth later, I don't know. Yes, I make a backup of the depth at the beginning amd write this backup depth at the end to the hashtable. Isn't this better? Because if I probe the Hash after the extensions and then get a Hashhit, I did the extensions calculation for nothing, am I right? >also, if you dont have a separate hash for qsearch then it may not be worth to >probe there. At the moment I dont use Hash in qsearch, because I noticed that there are some problems with the depth. In qsearch my distance in negative, but then I can't see the depth, of the calculation. Is it the natural way to fix this problem with 2 separate Tables? Of course I can use the same Key and Index than for my normal Table? Can I do it like this?: IF (disnace < 0) THEN read/write Table2 ELSE read/write Table1; Of course I should write an extra qsearch function to avoid such case queryies. Thanks for your experience, Martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.